FUNCTIONS¶

warning_is BLOCK STRING, TEST_NAME

Tests that BLOCK gives exactly the one specificated warning. The test fails if the BLOCK warns more then one times or doesn't warn. If the string is undef, then the tests succeeds if the BLOCK doesn't give any warning. Another way to say that there aren't any warnings in the block, is "warnings_are {foo()} [], "no warnings in"".

If you want to test for a warning given by carp, You have to write something like: "warning_is {carp "msg"} {carped => 'msg'}, "Test for a carped warning"". The test will fail, if a "normal" warning is found instead of a "carped" one.

Note: "warn "foo"" would print something like "foo at -e line 1". This method ignores everything after the at. That means, to match this warning you would have to call "warning_is {warn "foo"} "foo", "Foo succeeded"". If you need to test for a warning at an exactly line, try better something like "warning_like {warn "foo"} qr/at XYZ.dat line 5/".

warning_is and warning_are are only aliases to the same method. So you also could write "warning_is {foo()} [], "no warning"" or something similar. I decided to give two methods to have some better readable method names.

A true value is returned if the test succeeds, false otherwise.

The test name is optional, but recommended.

warnings_are BLOCK ARRAYREF, TEST_NAME

Tests to see that BLOCK gives exactly the specificated warnings. The test fails if the BLOCK warns a different number than the size of the ARRAYREf would have expected. If the ARRAYREF is equal to [], then the test succeeds if the BLOCK doesn't give any warning.

Please read also the notes to warning_is as these methods are only aliases.

If you want more than one tests for carped warnings look that way: "warnings_are {carp "c1"; carp "c2"} {carped =" ['c1','c2'];> or "warnings_are {foo()} ["Warning 1", {carped =" ["Carp 1", "Carp 2"]}, "Warning 2"]>. Note that "{carped =" ...}> has always to be a hash ref.

warning_like BLOCK REGEXP, TEST_NAME

Tests that BLOCK gives exactly one warning and it can be matched to the given regexp. If the string is undef, then the tests succeeds iff the BLOCK doesn't give any warning.

The REGEXP is matched after the whole warn line, which consists in general of "WARNING at __FILE__ line __LINE__". So you can check for a warning in at File Foo.pm line 5 with "warning_like {bar()} qr/at Foo.pm line 5/, "Testname"". I don't know whether it's sensful to do such a test :-( However, you should be prepared as a matching with 'at', 'file', '\d' or similar will always pass. Think to the qr/^foo/ if you want to test for warning "foo something" in file foo.pl.

You can also write the regexp in a string as "/.../" instead of using the qr/.../ syntax. Note that the slashes are important in the string, as strings without slashes are reserved for warning categories (to match warning categories as can be seen in the perllexwarn man page).

Similar to "warning_is", you can test for warnings via "carp" with: "warning_like {bar()} {carped =" qr/bar called too early/i};>

Similar to "warning_is"/"warnings_are", "warning_like" and "warnings_like" are only aliases to the same methods.

A true value is returned if the test succeeds, false otherwise.

The test name is optional, but recommended.

warning_like BLOCK STRING, TEST_NAME

Tests whether a BLOCK gives exactly one warning of the passed category. The categories are grouped in a tree, like it is expressed in perllexwarn. Note, that they have the hierarchical structure from perl 5.8.0, wich has a little bit changed to 5.6.1 or earlier versions (You can access the internal used tree with $Test::Warn::Categorization::tree, although I wouldn't recommend it)

Thanks to the grouping in a tree, it's simple possible to test for an 'io' warning, instead for testing for a 'closed|exec|layer|newline|pipe|unopened' warning.

Note, that warnings occuring at compile time, can only be catched in an eval block. So

  warning_like {eval q/"$x"; $x;/} 
               [qw/void uninitialized/], 
               "some warnings at compile time";
    

will work, while it wouldn't work without the eval.

Note, that it isn't possible yet, to test for own categories, created with warnings::register.

warnings_like BLOCK ARRAYREF, TEST_NAME

Tests to see that BLOCK gives exactly the number of the specificated warnings and all the warnings have to match in the defined order to the passed regexes.

Please read also the notes to warning_like as these methods are only aliases.

Similar to "warnings_are", you can test for multiple warnings via "carp" and for warning categories, too:

  warnings_like {foo()} 
                [qr/bar warning/,
                 qr/bar warning/,
                 {carped => qr/bar warning/i},
                 'io'
                ],
                "I hope, you'll never have to write a test for so many warnings :-)";
    

warnings_exist BLOCK STRING|ARRAYREF, TEST_NAME

Same as warning_like, but will warn() all warnings that do not match the supplied regex/category, instead of registering an error. Use this test when you just want to make sure that specific warnings were generated, and couldn't care less if other warnings happened in the same block of code.

  warnings_exist {...} [qr/expected warning/], "Expected warning is thrown";
  warnings_exist {...} ['uninitialized'], "Expected warning is thrown";
    

EXPORT¶

"warning_is", "warnings_are", "warning_like", "warnings_like", "warnings_exist" by default.