Capabilities (fi_info::caps)¶

The fi_info caps field is used to specify the features and services that the application requires of the network. This field is a bit-mask of desired capabilities. There are capability bits for each of the data transfer services previously mentioned: FI_MSG, FI_TAGGED, FI_RMA, FI_ATOMIC, and FI_COLLECTIVE. Applications should set each bit for each set of operations that it will use. These bits are often the only caps bits set by an application.

Capabilities are grouped into three general categories: primary, secondary, and primary modifiers. Primary capabilities must explicitly be requested by an application, and a provider must enable support for only those primary capabilities which were selected. This is required for both performance and security reasons. Primary modifiers are used to limit a primary capability, such as restricting an endpoint to being send-only.

Secondary capabilities may optionally be requested by an application. If requested, a provider must support a capability if it is asked for or fail the fi_getinfo request. A provider may optionally report non-requested secondary capabilities if doing so would not compromise performance or security. That is, a provider may grant an application a secondary capability, whether the application. The most commonly accessed secondary capability bits indicate if provider communication is restricted to the local node Ifor example, the shared memory provider only supports local communication) and/or remote nodes (which can be the case for NICs that lack loopback support). Other secondary capability bits mostly deal with features targeting highly-scalable applications, but may not be commonly supported across multiple providers.

Because different providers support different sets of capabilities, applications that desire optimal network performance may need to code for a capability being either present or absent. When present, such capabilities can offer a scalability or performance boost. When absent, an application may prefer to adjust its protocol or implementation to work around the network limitations. Although providers can often emulate features, doing so can impact overall performance, including the performance of data transfers that otherwise appear unrelated to the feature in use. For example, if a provider needs to insert protocol headers into the message stream in order to implement a given capability, the insertion of that header could negatively impact the performance of all transfers. By exposing such limitations to the application, the application developer has better control over how to best emulate the feature or work around its absence.

It is recommended that applications code for only those capabilities required to achieve the best performance. If a capability would have little to no effect on overall performance, developers should avoid using such features as part of an initial implementation. This will allow the application to work well across the widest variety of hardware. Application optimizations can then add support for less common features. To see which features are supported by which providers, see the libfabric Provider Feature Maxtrix for the relevant release.

Mode Bits (fi_info::mode)¶

Where capability bits represent features desired by applications, mode bits correspond to behavior needed by the provider. That is, capability bits are top down requests, whereas mode bits are bottom up restrictions. Mode bits are set by the provider to request that the application use the API in a specific way in order to achieve optimal performance. Mode bits often imply that the additional work to implement certain communication semantics needed by the application will be less if implemented by the applicaiton than forcing that same implementation down into the provider. Mode bits arise as a result of hardware implementation restrictions.

An application developer decides which mode bits they want to or can easily support as part of their development process. Each mode bit describes a particular behavior that the application must follow to use various interfaces. Applications set the mode bits that they support when calling fi_getinfo(). If a provider requires a mode bit that isn’t set, that provider will be skipped by fi_getinfo(). If a provider does not need a mode bit that is set, it will respond to the fi_getinfo() call, with the mode bit cleared. This indicates that the application does not need to perform the action required by the mode bit.

One of common mode bit needed by providers is FI_CONTEXT (and FI_CONTEXT2). This mode bit requires that applications pass in a libfabric defined data structure (struct fi_context) into any data transfer function. That structure must remain valid and unused by the application until the data transfer operation completes. The purpose behind this mode bit is that the struct fi_context provides “scratch” space that the provider can use to track the request. For example, it may need to insert the request into a linked list while it is pending, or track the number of times that an outbound transfer has been retried. Since many applications already track outstanding operations with their own data structure, by embedding the struct fi_context into that same structure, overall performance can be improved. This avoids the provider needing to allocate and free internal structures for each request.

Continuing with this example, if an application does not already track outstanding requests, then it would leave the FI_CONTEXT mode bit unset. This would indicate that the provider needs to get and release its own structure for tracking purposes. In this case, the costs would essentially be the same whether it were done by the application or provider.

For the broadest support of different network technologies, applications should attempt to support as many mode bits as feasible. It is recommended that providers support applications that cannot support any mode bits, with as small an impact as possible. However, implementation of mode bit avoidance in the provider can still impact performance, even when the mode bit is disabled. As a result, some providers may always require specific mode bits be set.

Attributes (fi_fabric_attr)¶

The fabric attributes are straightforward.

struct fi_fabric_attr {


    struct fid_fabric *fabric;


    char *name;


    char *prov_name;


    uint32_t prov_version;


    uint32_t api_version;
};
    

The only field that applications are likely to use directly is the prov_name. This is a string value that can be used by hints to select a specific provider for use. On most systems, there will be multiple providers available. Only one is likely to represent the high-performance network attached to the system. Others are generic providers that may be available on any system, such as the TCP socket and UDP providers.

The fabric field is used to help applications manage opened fabric resources. If an application has already opened a fabric that can support the returned fi_info structure, this will be set to that fabric.

Attributes (fi_domain_attr)¶

One of the goals of a domain is to define the relationship between data transfer services (endpoints) and completion services (completion queues and counters). Many of the domain attributes describe that relationship and its impact to the application.

struct fi_domain_attr {


    struct fid_domain *domain;


    char *name;


    enum fi_threading threading;


    enum fi_progress control_progress;


    enum fi_progress data_progress;


    enum fi_resource_mgmt resource_mgmt;


    enum fi_av_type av_type;


    enum fi_mr_mode mr_mode;


    size_t mr_key_size;


    size_t cq_data_size;


    size_t cq_cnt;


    size_t ep_cnt;


    size_t tx_ctx_cnt;


    size_t rx_ctx_cnt;


    ...
    

Full details of the domain attributes and their meaning are in the fi_domain man page. Information on select attributes and their impact to the application are described below.

Threading (fi_threading)¶

libfabric defines a unique threading model. The libfabric design is heavily influenced by object-oriented programming concepts. A multi-threaded application must determine how libfabric objects (domains, endpoints, completion queues, etc.) will be allocated among its threads, or if any thread can access any object. For example, an application may spawn a new thread to handle each new connected endpoint. The domain threading field provides a mechanism for an application to identify which objects may be accessed simultaneously by different threads. This in turn allows a provider to optimize or, in some cases, eliminate internal synchronization and locking around those objects.

Threading defines where providers could optimize synchronization primitives. However, providers may still implement more serialization than is needed by the application. (This is usually a result of keeping the provider implementation simpler).

It is recommended that applications target either FI_THREAD_SAFE (full thread safety implemented by the provider) or FI_THREAD_DOMAIN (objects associated with a single domain will only be accessed by a single thread).

Progress (fi_progress)¶

Progress models are a result of using the host processor in order to perform some portion of the transport protocol. In order to simplify development, libfabric defines two progress models: automatic or manual. It does not attempt to identify which specific interface features may be offloaded, or what operations require additional processing by the application’s thread.

Automatic progress means that an operation initiated by the application will eventually complete, even if the application makes no further calls into the libfabric API. The operation is either offloaded entirely onto hardware, the provider uses an internal thread, or the operating system kernel may perform the task. The use of automatic progress may increase system overhead and latency in the latter two cases. For control operations, such as connection setup, this is usually acceptable. However, the impact to data transfers may be measurable, especially if internal threads are required to provide automatic progress.

The manual progress model can avoid this overhead for providers that do not offload all transport features into hardware. With manual progress the provider implementation will handle transport operations as part of specific libfabric functions. For example, a call to fi_cq_read() which retrieves an array completed operations may also be responsible for sending ack messages to notify peers that a message has been received. Since reading the completion queue is part of the normal operation of an application, there is minimal impact to the application and additional threads are avoided.

Applications need to take care when using manual progress, particularly if they link into libfabric multiple times through different code paths or library dependencies. If application threads are used to drive progress, such as responding to received data with ACKs, then it is critical that the application thread call into libfabric in a timely manner.

Memory Registration (fid_mr)¶

RMA, atomic, and collective operations can read and write memory that is owned by a peer process, and neither require the involvement of the target processor. Because the memory can be modified over the network, an application must opt into exposing its memory to peers. This is handled by the memory registration process. Registered memory regions associate memory buffers with permissions granted for access by fabric resources. A memory buffer must be registered before it can be used as the target of a remote RMA, atomic, or collective data transfer. Additionally, a fabric provider may require that data buffers be registered before being used even in the case of local transfers. The latter is necessary to ensure that the virtual to physical page mappings do not change while network hardware is performing the transfer.

In order to handle diverse hardware requirements, there are a set of mr_mode bits associated with memory registration. The mr_mode bits behave similar to fi_info mode bits. Applications indicate which types of restrictions they can support, and the providers clear those bits which aren’t needed.

For hardware that requires memory registration, managing registration is critical to achieving good performance and scalability. The act of registering memory is costly and should be avoided on a per data transfer basis. libfabric has extensive internal support for managing memory registration, hiding registration from user application, caching registration to reduce per transfer overhead, and detecting when cached registrations are no longer valid. It is recommended that applications that are not natively designed to account for registering memory to make use of libfabric’s registration cache. This can be done by simply not setting the relevant mr_mode bits.

Memory Region APIs¶

The following APIs highlight how to allocate and access a registered memory region. Note that this is not a complete list of memory region (MR) calls, and for full details on each API, readers should refer directly to the fi_mr man page.

int fi_mr_reg(struct fid_domain *domain, const void *buf, size_t len,


    uint64_t access, uint64_t offset, uint64_t requested_key, uint64_t flags,


    struct fid_mr **mr, void *context);
void * fi_mr_desc(struct fid_mr *mr);
uint64_t fi_mr_key(struct fid_mr *mr);
    

By default, memory regions are associated with a domain. A MR is accessible by any endpoint that is opened on that domain. A region starts at the address specified by `buf', and is `len' bytes long. The `access' parameter are permission flags that are OR’ed together. The permissions indicate which type of operations may be invoked against the region (e.g. FI_READ, FI_WRITE, FI_REMOTE_READ, FI_REMOTE_WRITE). The `buf' parameter typically references allocated virtual memory.

A MR is associated with local and remote protection keys. The local key is referred to as a memory descriptor and may be retrieved by calling fi_mr_desc(). This call is only needed if the FI_MR_LOCAL mr_mode bit has been set. The memory descriptor is passed directly into data transfer operations, for example:

/* fi_mr_desc() example using fi_send() */
fi_send(ep, buf, len, fi_mr_desc(mr), 0, NULL);
    

The remote key, or simply MR key, is used by the peer when targeting the MR with an RMA or atomic operation. In many cases, the key will need to be sent in a separate message to the initiating peer. libfabric API uses a 64-bit key where one is used. The actual key size used by a provider is part of its domain attributes Support for larger key sizes, as required by some providers, is conveyed through an mr_mode bit, and requires the use of extended MR API calls that map the larger size to a 64-bit value.

Active (fid_ep)¶

Active endpoints may be connection-oriented or connection-less. They are considered active as they may be used to perform data transfers. All data transfer interfaces – messages (fi_msg), tagged messages (fi_tagged), RMA (fi_rma), atomics (fi_atomic), and collectives (fi_collective) – are associated with active endpoints. Though an individual endpoint may not be enabled to use all data transfers. In standard configurations, an active endpoint has one transmit and one receive queue. In general, operations that generate traffic on the fabric are posted to the transmit queue. This includes all RMA and atomic operations, along with sent messages and sent tagged messages. Operations that post buffers for receiving incoming data are submitted to the receive queue.

Active endpoints are created in the disabled state. The endpoint must first be configured prior to it being enabled. Endpoints must transition into an enabled state before accepting data transfer operations, including posting of receive buffers. The fi_enable() call is used to transition an active endpoint into an enabled state. The fi_connect() and fi_accept() calls will also transition an endpoint into the enabled state, if it is not already enabled.

int fi_endpoint(struct fid_domain *domain, struct fi_info *info,


    struct fid_ep **ep, void *context);
    

Enabling (fi_enable)¶

In order to transition an endpoint into an enabled state, it must be bound to one or more fabric resources. This includes binding the endpoint to a completion queue and event queue. Unconnected endpoints must also be bound to an address vector.

/* Example to enable an unconnected endpoint */
/* Allocate an address vector and associated it with the endpoint */
fi_av_open(domain, &av_attr, &av, NULL);
fi_ep_bind(ep, &av->fid, 0);
/* Allocate and associate completion queues with the endpoint */
fi_cq_open(domain, &cq_attr, &cq, NULL);
fi_ep_bind(ep, &cq->fid, FI_TRANSMIT | FI_RECV);
fi_enable(ep);
    

In the above example, we allocate an AV and CQ. The attributes for the AV and CQ are omitted (additional discussion below). Those are then associated with the endpoint through the fi_ep_bind() call. After all necessary resources have been assigned to the endpoint, we enable it. Enabling the endpoint indicates to the provider that it should allocate any hardware and software resources and complete the initialization for the endpoint. (If the endpoint is not bound to all necessary resources, the fi_enable() call will fail.)

The fi_enable() call is always called for unconnected endpoints. Connected endpoints may be able to skip calling fi_enable(), since fi_connect() and fi_accept() will enable the endpoint automatically. However, applications may still call fi_enable() prior to calling fi_connect() or fi_accept(). Doing so allows the application to post receive buffers to the endpoint, which ensures that they are available to receive data in the case the peer endpoint sends messages immediately after it establishes the connection.

Passive (fid_pep)¶

Passive endpoints are used to listen for incoming connection requests. Passive endpoints are of type FI_EP_MSG, and may not perform any data transfers. An application wishing to create a passive endpoint typically calls fi_getinfo() using the FI_SOURCE flag, often only specifying a `service' address. The service address corresponds to a TCP port number.

Passive endpoints are associated with event queues. Event queues report connection requests from peers. Unlike active endpoints, passive endpoints are not associated with a domain. This allows an application to listen for connection requests across multiple domains, though still restricted to a single provider.

/* Example passive endpoint listen */
fi_passive_ep(fabric, info, &pep, NULL);
fi_eq_open(fabric, &eq_attr, &eq, NULL);
fi_pep_bind(pep, &eq->fid, 0);
fi_listen(pep);
    

A passive endpoint must be bound to an event queue before calling listen. This ensures that connection requests can be reported to the application. To accept new connections, the application waits for a request, allocates a new active endpoint for it, and accepts the request.

/* Example accepting a new connection */
/* Wait for a CONNREQ event */
fi_eq_sread(eq, &event, &cm_entry, sizeof cm_entry, -1, 0);
assert(event == FI_CONNREQ);
/* Allocate a new endpoint for the connection */
if (!cm_entry.info->domain_attr->domain)


    fi_domain(fabric, cm_entry.info, &domain, NULL);
fi_endpoint(domain, cm_entry.info, &ep, NULL);
fi_ep_bind(ep, &eq->fid, 0);
fi_cq_open(domain, &cq_attr, &cq, NULL);
fi_ep_bind(ep, &cq->fid, FI_TRANSMIT | FI_RECV);
fi_enable(ep);
fi_recv(ep, rx_buf, len, NULL, 0, NULL);
fi_accept(ep, NULL, 0);
fi_eq_sread(eq, &event, &cm_entry, sizeof cm_entry, -1, 0);
assert(event == FI_CONNECTED);
    

The connection request event (FI_CONNREQ) includes information about the type of endpoint to allocate, including default attributes to use. If a domain has not already been opened for the endpoint, one must be opened. Then the endpoint and related resources can be allocated. Unlike the unconnected endpoint example above, a connected endpoint does not have an AV, but does need to be bound to an event queue. In this case, we use the same EQ as the listening endpoint. Once the other EP resources (e.g. CQ) have been allocated and bound, the EP can be enabled.

To accept the connection, the application calls fi_accept(). Note that because of thread synchronization issues, it is possible for the active endpoint to receive data even before fi_accept() can return. The posting of receive buffers prior to calling fi_accept() handles this condition, which avoids network flow control issues occurring immediately after connecting.

The fi_eq_sread() calls are blocking (synchronous) read calls to the event queue. These calls wait until an event occurs, which in this case are connection request and establishment events.

EP Attributes (fi_ep_attr)¶

The properties of an endpoint are specified using endpoint attributes. These are attributes for the endpoint as a whole. There are additional attributes specifically related to the transmit and receive contexts underpinning the endpoint (details below).

struct fi_ep_attr {


    enum fi_ep_type type;


    uint32_t        protocol;


    uint32_t        protocol_version;


    size_t          max_msg_size;


    ...
};
    

A full description of each field is available in the fi_endpoint man page, with selected details listed below.

Endpoint Type (fi_ep_type)¶

This indicates the type of endpoint: reliable datagram (FI_EP_RDM), reliable-connected (FI_EP_MSG), or unreliable datagram (FI_EP_DGRAM). Nearly all applications will want to specify the endpoint type as a hint passed into fi_getinfo, as most applications will only be coded to support a single endpoint type.

Maximum Message Size (max_msg_size)¶

This size is the maximum size for any data transfer operation that goes over the endpoint. For unreliable datagram endpoints, this is often the MTU of the underlying network. For reliable endpoints, this value is often a restriction of the underlying transport protocol. A common minimum maximum message size is 2GB, though some providers support an arbitrarily large size. Applications that require transfers larger than the maximum reported size are required to break up a single, large transfer into multiple operations.

Providers expose their hardware or network limits to the applications, rather than segmenting large transfers internally, in order to minimize completion overhead. For example, for a provider to support large message segmentation internally, it would need to emulate all completion mechanisms (queues and counters) in software, even if transfers that are larger than the transport supported maximum were never used.

Message Order Size (max_order_xxx_size)¶

These fields specify data ordering. They define the delivery order of transport data into target memory for RMA and atomic operations. Data ordering requires message ordering. If message ordering is not specified, these fields do not apply.

For example, suppose that an application issues two RMA write operations to the same target memory location. (The application may be writing a time stamp value every time a local condition is met, for instance). Message ordering indicates that the first write as initiated by the sender is the first write processed by the receiver. Data ordering indicates whether the data from the first write updates memory before the second write updates memory.

The max_order_xxx_size fields indicate how large a message may be while still achieving data ordering. If a field is 0, then no data ordering is guaranteed. If a field is the same as the max_msg_size, then data order is guaranteed for all messages.

Providers may support data ordering up to max_msg_size for back to back operations that are the same. For example, an RMA write followed by an RMA write may have data ordering regardless of the size of the data transfer (max_order_waw_size = max_msg_size). Mixed operations, such as a read followed by a write, are often restricted. This is because RMA read operations may require acknowledgments from the initiator, which impacts the re-transmission protocol.

For example, consider an RMA read followed by a write. The target will process the read request, retrieve the data, and send a reply. While that is occurring, a write is received that wants to update the same memory location accessed by the read. If the target processes the write, it will overwrite the memory used by the read. If the read response is lost, and the read is retried, the target will be unable to re-send the data. To handle this, the target either needs to: defer handling the write until it receives an acknowledgment for the read response, buffer the read response so it can be re-transmitted, or indicate that data ordering is not guaranteed.

Because the read or write operation may be gigabytes in size, deferring the write may add significant latency, and buffering the read response may be impractical. The max_order_xxx_size fields indicate how large back to back operations may be with ordering still maintained. In many cases, read after write and write and read ordering may be significantly limited, but still usable for implementing specific algorithms, such as a global locking mechanism.

Rx/Tx Context Attributes (fi_rx_attr / fi_tx_attr)¶

The endpoint attributes define the overall abilities for the endpoint; however, attributes that apply specifically to receive or transmit contexts are defined by struct fi_rx_attr and fi_tx_attr, respectively:

struct fi_rx_attr {


    uint64_t caps;


    uint64_t mode;


    uint64_t op_flags;


    uint64_t msg_order;


    uint64_t comp_order;


    ...
};
struct fi_tx_attr {


    uint64_t caps;


    uint64_t mode;


    uint64_t op_flags;


    uint64_t msg_order;


    uint64_t comp_order;


    size_t inject_size;


    ...
};
    

Rx/Tx context capabilities must be a subset of the endpoint capabilities. For many applications, the default attributes returned by the provider will be sufficient, with the application only needing to specify endpoint attributes.

Both context attributes include an op_flags field. This field is used by applications to specify the default operation flags to use with any call. For example, by setting the transmit context’s op_flags to FI_INJECT, the application has indicated to the provider that all transmit operations should assume `inject' behavior is desired. I.e. the buffer provided to the call must be returned to the application upon return from the function. The op_flags applies to all operations that do not provide flags as part of the call (e.g. fi_sendmsg). One use of op_flags is to specify the default completion semantic desired (discussed next) by the application. By setting the default op_flags at initialization time, we can avoid passing the flags as arguments into some data transfer calls, avoid parsing the flags, and can prepare submitted commands ahead of time.

It should be noted that some attributes are dependent upon the peer endpoint having supporting attributes in order to achieve correct application behavior. For example, message order must be the compatible between the initiator’s transmit attributes and the target’s receive attributes. Any mismatch may result in incorrect behavior that could be difficult to debug.

CQs (fid_cq)¶

Completion queues often map directly to provider hardware mechanisms, and libfabric is designed around minimizing the software impact of accessing those mechanisms. Unlike other objects discussed so far (fabrics, domains, endpoints), completion queues are not part of the fi_info structure or involved with the fi_getinfo() call.

All active endpoints must be bound with one or more completion queues. This is true even if completions will be suppressed by the application (e.g. using the FI_SELECTIVE_COMPLETION flag). Completion queues are needed to report operations that complete in error and help drive progress in the case of manual progress.

CQs are allocated separately from endpoints and are associated with endpoints through the fi_ep_bind() function.

CQ Format (fi_cq_format)¶

In order to minimize the amount of data that a provider must report, the type of completion data written back to the application is select-able. This limits the number of bytes the provider writes to memory, and allows necessary completion data to fit into a compact structure. Each CQ format maps to a specific completion structure. Developers should analyze each structure, select the smallest structure that contains all of the data it requires, and specify the corresponding enum value as the CQ format.

For example, if an application only needs to know which request completed, along with the size of a received message, it can select the following:

cq_attr->format = FI_CQ_FORMAT_MSG;
struct fi_cq_msg_entry {


    void      *op_context;


    uint64_t  flags;


    size_t    len;
};
    

Once the format has been selected, the underlying provider will assume that read operations against the CQ will pass in an array of the corresponding structure. The CQ data formats are designed such that a structure that reports more information can be cast to one that reports less.

Reading Completions (fi_cq_read)¶

Completions may be read from a CQ by using one of the non-blocking calls, fi_cq_read / fi_cq_readfrom, or one of the blocking calls, fi_cq_sread / fi_cq_sreadfrom. Regardless of which call is used, applications pass in an array of completion structures based on the selected CQ format. The CQ interfaces are optimized for batch completion processing, allowing the application to retrieve multiple completions from a single read call. The difference between the read and readfrom calls is that readfrom returns source addressing data, if available. The readfrom derivative of the calls is only useful for unconnected endpoints, and only if the corresponding endpoint has been configured with the FI_SOURCE capability.

FI_SOURCE requires that the provider use the source address available in the raw completion data, such as the packet’s source address, to retrieve a matching entry in the endpoint’s address vector. Applications that carry some sort of source identifier as part of their data packets can avoid the overhead associated with using FI_SOURCE.

Retrieving Errors¶

Because the selected completion structure is insufficient to report all data necessary to debug or handle an operation that completes in error, failed operations are reported using a separate fi_cq_readerr() function. This call takes as input a CQ error entry structure, which allows the provider to report more information regarding the reason for the failure.

/* read error prototype */
fi_cq_readerr(struct fid_cq *cq, struct fi_cq_err_entry *buf, uint64_t flags);
/* error data structure */
struct fi_cq_err_entry {


    void      *op_context;


    uint64_t  flags;


    size_t    len;


    void      *buf;


    uint64_t  data;


    uint64_t  tag;


    size_t    olen;


    int       err;


    int       prov_errno;


    void      *err_data;


    size_t    err_data_size;
};
/* Sample error handling */
struct fi_cq_msg_entry entry;
struct fi_cq_err_entry err_entry;
int ret;
ret = fi_cq_read(cq, &entry, 1);
if (ret == -FI_EAVAIL)


    ret = fi_cq_readerr(cq, &err_entry, 0);
    

As illustrated, if an error entry has been inserted into the completion queue, then attempting to read the CQ will result in the read call returning -FI_EAVAIL (error available). This indicates that the application must use the fi_cq_readerr() call to remove the failed operation’s completion information before other completions can be reaped from the CQ.

A fabric error code regarding the failure is reported as the err field in the fi_cq_err_entry structure. A provider specific error code is also available through the prov_errno field. This field can be decoded into a displayable string using the fi_cq_strerror() routine. The err_data field is provider specific data that assists the provider in decoding the reason for the failure.

AV Type (fi_av_type)¶

There are two types of address vectors. The type refers to the format of the returned fi_addr_t values for addresses that are inserted into the AV. With type FI_AV_TABLE, returned addresses are simple indices, and developers may think of the AV as an array of addresses. Each address that is inserted into the AV is mapped to the index of the next free array slot. The advantage of FI_AV_TABLE is that applications can refer to peers using a simple index, eliminating an application’s need to store any addressing data. I.e. the application can generate the fi_addr_t values themselves. This type maps well to applications, such as MPI, where a peer is referenced by rank.

The second type is FI_AV_MAP. This type does not define any specific format for the fi_addr_t value. Applications that use type map are required to provide the correct fi_addr_t for a given peer when issuing a data transfer operation. The advantage of FI_AV_MAP is that a provider can use the fi_addr_t to encode the target’s address, which avoids retrieving the data from memory. As a simple example, consider a fabric that uses TCP/IPv4 based addressing. An fi_addr_t is large enough to contain the address, which allows a provider to copy the data from the fi_addr_t directly into an outgoing packet.

Sharing AVs Between Processes¶

Large scale parallel programs typically run with multiple processes allocated on each node. Because these processes communicate with the same set of peers, the addressing data needed by each process is the same. Libfabric defines a mechanism by which processes running on the same node may share their address vectors. This allows a system to maintain a single copy of addressing data, rather than one copy per process.

Although libfabric does not require any implementation for how an address vector is shared, the interfaces map well to using shared memory. Address vectors which will be shared are given an application specific name. How an application selects a name that avoid conflicts with unrelated processes, or how it communicates the name with peer processes is outside the scope of libfabric.

In addition to having a name, a shared AV also has a base map address – map_addr. Use of map_addr is only important for address vectors that are of type FI_AV_MAP, and allows applications to share fi_addr_t values. From the viewpoint of the application, the map_addr is the base value for all fi_addr_t values. A common use for map_addr is for the process that creates the initial address vector to request a value from the provider, exchange the returned map_addr with its peers, and for the peers to open the shared AV using the same map_addr. This allows the fi_addr_t values to be stored in shared memory that is accessible by all peers.